By Gary Snyder
"...experts have noted that an overemphasis on overhead is
misleading. We agree and always have. We further believe that the most critical
dimension in evaluating a nonprofit has to do with achieving meaningful
results. It is in that spirit that we jointly signed on to today’s press
release about overhead, with the BBB Wise Giving Alliance and
Guidestar. On the other hand, we do not agree with those that say there is no
place for overhead in evaluating charities.
Overhead, show me a
nonprofit that uses 70% of its funds for overhead and I predict with a great
deal of certainty that it is an organization that is either clueless or focused
on lining someone’s pockets rather than effectively serving others. People may
disagree on what the best metric of overhead should be, but to say overhead is
irrelevant is to deny a useful indicator of where many thieves and scoundrels
dwell. I have worked in enough nonprofits with unethical leaders to say without
question that we need to get serious about their existence as more than a
rarity (see the book Silence, by Gary Snyder). As noted
above, this is not meant to imply in any way that overhead is the only metric
donors should consider, but rather that it is an important data point.
Charity Navigator believes…”
the three dimensions that must be considered for a social investor to have the
critical information needed to make a wise decision are the charity’s:
- Financial Health (CN 1.0 launched
April 2002) – Is the nonprofit sustainable? Does it have robust financial
strength to survive in good times and bad? Is the overhead not at the
extreme end of the continuum?
- Accountability & Transparency (CN
2.0 launched September 2011) – Does the organization have ethical
practices, good governance and transparency? Is it accountable to its constituents?
- Results Reporting (CN 3.0
methodology launched January 2013) – Can the organization supply
information about meaningful and lasting change in the communities and
lives of the people it serves? Can they show evidence that these changes
are as a result of their efforts? Do they have systems and processes in
place to effectively manage their performance?
Charity Navigator
suggests that...”we MUST get past the notion that
overhead is all that matters, while recognizing that efficiency and financial
health is of critical importance in maintaining high performance and the best
results for the long term. We MUST get past the notion
of doing the “good work” with no accountability and transparency, because we
know that charities without strong governance and ethical best practices are
far more likely to have leadership problems. Once again, to maintain effective
results we have to have these characteristics and policies in place. Finally,
we MUST get past the idea that nonprofits are too
complex or unique to be measured. I have seen it close up for years and it is
not a pretty picture. The nonprofit sector must get its act together and make
sure it is really helping provide meaningful and lasting change. It is life or
death for many of those we serve whether charities are efficient, accountable,
transparent and effective or not.
Nonprofit Imperative gathers its information principally from public documents...some of which are directly quoted. Virtually all cited are in some phase of criminal proceedings; some have not been charged, however. Cites in various media: Featured in print, broadcast, and online media outlets, including: Vermont Public Radio, Miami Herald, National Public Radio, Huffington Post, The Sun News, Atlanta Journal Constitution, Wall Street Journal (Profile, News and Photos), FOX2, ABC Spotlight on the News, WWJ Radio, Ethics World, Aspen Philanthropy Newsletter, Harvard Business Review, Current Affairs, The Chronicle of Philanthropy, St. Petersburg Times, B, USA Today Topics, Newsweek.com, Responsive Philanthropy Magazine, New York Times...and many more Nonprofits: On the Brink (2006) Silence: The Impending Threat to the Charitable Sector (2011)
No comments:
Post a Comment