In my community, the United
Way readjusted its funding priorities much to the dismay of several large
agencies. Since I was on the board of an agency, I am privy to the bad taste
that the process left. Aside from the effects on the agencies, many volunteers
that were rather large supporters of the United Way and were board members of affected
agencies could not support the process.
I guess the process elsewhere
has lead to similar results.
In York County, Pa. one agency, Habitat for Humanity, expected
to receive grants from the fund, and its board was "highly upset" and
offended to be omitted, according to Executive Director Debbie Krout-Althoff. The
agency took the unusual step of issuing a press release, under the heading
"Breaking News," to highlight the perceived snub.
The release
caught United Way Executive Director Bob Woods off guard. He said Habitat, a
new partner agency in 2010, isn't eligible until next year for Community Fund
donations, which are distributed through three-year cycles. However, a report
in The York Dispatch from 2010 on the new partnership quotes Woods as saying
Habitat could receive Community Funds in 2011-12, but
noted it would have to submit a proposal, competing with 77 programs under
then-34 partner agencies. Woods said, "...
It doesn't do anyone any good to air this out in the public."
In
Dayton Ohio, the Area Chapter of the American Red Cross faces a 76 percent
reduction in funding from the United Way of Greater Dayton in the next fiscal
year. About 18 percent of the local chapter’s $3.7 million in revenue last year
came from the United Way. Tom
Fodor, CEO of the local chapter, said he was shocked by the United Way’s
decision to cut his group’s funding so deeply. “Nobody anticipates a 76 percent
cut,” he said.
Fodor said
the Red Cross was aware that the United Way’s funding priorities had changed
and his group tried to tailor its application to reflect the shift in focus. The shift in the formula has left the American Red Cross
with a big hole in its budget. During the past three fiscal years, the Red
Cross has seen its funding from United Way steadily fall from $751,800 to
$657,000, and now tumble to $156,500.
The Red Cross has
started to consider the ramifications of the funding cuts, but the organization
plans to appeal the funding decision. Fodor said Red Cross will see the appeal
process through before deciding how to cope with the loss in revenue.
It seems that in
all three cases communications were the problem. Although the shifting priorities
are meant to address some very acute problems, the process left a hole in the
transmission.
Nonprofit Imperative gathers its information principally from public documents...some of which are directly quoted. Virtually all cited are in some phase of criminal proceedings; some have not been charged, however. Cites in various media: Featured in print, broadcast, and online media outlets, including: Vermont Public Radio, Miami Herald, National Public Radio, Huffington Post, The Sun News, Atlanta Journal Constitution, Wall Street Journal (Profile, News and Photos), FOX2, ABC Spotlight on the News, WWJ Radio, Ethics World, Aspen Philanthropy Newsletter, Harvard Business Review, Current Affairs, The Chronicle of Philanthropy, St. Petersburg Times, B, USA Today Topics, , Newsweek.com, Responsive Philanthropy Magazine, New York Times...and many more • Nonprofits: On the Brink (iUniverse, 2006)
No comments:
Post a Comment